Translate

Showing posts with label belief. Show all posts
Showing posts with label belief. Show all posts

Monday, November 7, 2011

BELIEF IN FETISHES

.
.
From THE URANTIA BOOK
Part III, 88, 1
.
Belief in Fetishes
.
 Primitive man always wanted to make anything extraordinary into a fetish; chance therefore gave origin to many. A man is sick, something happens, and he gets well. The same thing is true of the reputation of many medicines and the chance methods of treating disease. Objects connected with dreams were likely to be converted into fetishes. Volcanoes, but not mountains, became fetishes; comets, but not stars. Early man regarded shooting stars and meteors as indicating the arrival on earth of special visiting spirits.
.
.
.
 The first fetishes were peculiarly marked pebbles, and “sacred stones” have ever since been sought by man; a string of beads was once a collection of sacred stones, a battery of charms. Many tribes had fetish stones, but few have survived as have the Kaaba and the Stone of Scone. Fire and water were also among the early fetishes, and fire worship, together with belief in holy water, still survives.
.
.
.
 Tree fetishes were a later development, but among some tribes the persistence of nature worship led to belief in charms indwelt by some sort of nature spirit. When plants and fruits became fetishes, they were taboo as food. The apple was among the first to fall into this category; it was never eaten by the Levantine peoples.
.
.
.
 If an animal ate human flesh, it became a fetish. In this way the dog came to be the sacred animal of the Parsees. If the fetish is an animal and the ghost is permanently resident therein, then fetishism may impinge on reincarnation. In many ways the savages envied the animals; they did not feel superior to them and were often named after their favorite beasts.
.
.
 When animals became fetishes, there ensued the taboos on eating the flesh of the fetish animal. Apes and monkeys, because of resemblance to man, early became fetish animals; later, snakes, birds, and swine were also similarly regarded. At one time the cow was a fetish, the milk being taboo while the excreta were highly esteemed. The serpent was revered in Palestine, especially by the Phoenicians, who, along with the Jews, considered it to be the mouthpiece of evil spirits. Even many moderns believe in the charm powers of reptiles. From Arabia on through India to the snake dance of the Moqui tribe of red men the serpent has been revered.
.
.
.
 Certain days of the week were fetishes. For ages Friday has been regarded as an unlucky day and the number thirteen as an evil numeral. The lucky numbers three and seven came from later revelations; four was the lucky number of primitive man and was derived from the early recognition of the four points of the compass. It was held unlucky to count cattle or other possessions; the ancients always opposed the taking of a census, “numbering the people.”
.
.
 Primitive man did not make an undue fetish out of sex; the reproductive function received only a limited amount of attention. The savage was natural minded, not obscene or prurient.
.
.

 Saliva was a potent fetish; devils could be driven out by spitting on a person. For an elder or superior to spit on one was the highest compliment. Parts of the human body were looked upon as potential fetishes, particularly the hair and nails. The long-growing fingernails of the chiefs were highly prized, and the trimmings thereof were a powerful fetish. Belief in skull fetishes accounts for much of later-day head-hunting. The umbilical cord was a highly prized fetish; even today it is so regarded in Africa. Mankind’s first toy was a preserved umbilical cord. Set with pearls, as was often done, it was man’s first necklace.

.
.
.
 Hunchbacked and crippled children were regarded as fetishes; lunatics were believed to be moon-struck. Primitive man could not distinguish between genius and insanity; idiots were either beaten to death or revered as fetish personalities. Hysteria increasingly confirmed the popular belief in witchcraft; epileptics often were priests and medicine men. Drunkenness was looked upon as a form of spirit possession; when a savage went on a spree, he put a leaf in his hair for the purpose of disavowing responsibility for his acts. Poisons and intoxicants became fetishes; they were deemed to be possessed.
.
.

 Many people looked upon geniuses as fetish personalities possessed by a wise spirit. And these talented humans soon learned to resort to fraud and trickery for the advancement of their selfish interests. A fetish man was thought to be more than human; he was divine, even infallible. Thus did chiefs, kings, priests, prophets, and church rulers eventually wield great power and exercise unbounded authority.
.
.
.

Monday, May 30, 2011

THE CERTITUDE OF THE DIVINE

.
.
From THE URANTIA BOOK
Part III, 102, 7
.
 .
The Universal Father, being self-existent, is also self-explanatory; he actually lives in every rational mortal. But you cannot be sure about God unless you know him; sonship is the only experience which makes fatherhood certain. The universe is everywhere undergoing change. A changing universe is a dependent universe; such a creation cannot be either final or absolute. A finite universe is wholly dependent on the Ultimate and the Absolute. The universe and God are not identical; one is cause, the other effect. The cause is absolute, infinite, eternal, and changeless; the effect, time-space and transcendental but ever changing, always growing.
.
.
 God is the one and only self-caused fact in the universe. He is the secret of the order, plan, and purpose of the whole creation of things and beings. The everywhere-changing universe is regulated and stabilized by absolutely unchanging laws, the habits of an unchanging God. The fact of God, the divine law, is changeless; the truth of God, his relation to the universe, is a relative revelation which is ever adaptable to the constantly evolving universe.
.
 Those who would invent a religion without God are like those who would gather fruit without trees, have children without parents. You cannot have effects without causes; only the I AM is causeless. The fact of religious experience implies God, and such a God of personal experience must be a personal Deity. You cannot pray to a chemical formula, supplicate a mathematical equation, worship a hypothesis, confide in a postulate, commune with a process, serve an abstraction, or hold loving fellowship with a law.
.
.
True, many apparently religious traits can grow out of nonreligious roots. Man can, intellectually, deny God and yet be morally good, loyal, filial, honest, and even idealistic. Man may graft many purely humanistic branches onto his basic spiritual nature and thus apparently prove his contentions in behalf of a godless religion, but such an experience is devoid of survival values, God-knowingness and God-ascension. In such a mortal experience only social fruits are forthcoming, not spiritual. The graft determines the nature of the fruit, notwithstanding
 that the living sustenance is drawn from the roots of
 original divine endowment of both mind and spirit.
.
 The intellectual earmark of religion is certainty; the philosophical characteristic is consistency; the social fruits are love and service.
.
.
 The God-knowing individual is not one who is blind to the difficulties or unmindful of the obstacles which stand in the way of finding God in the maze of superstition, tradition, and materialistic tendencies of modern times. He has encountered all these deterrents and triumphed over them, surmounted them by living faith, and attained the highlands of spiritual experience in spite of them. But it is true that many who are inwardly sure about God fear to assert such feelings of certainty because of the multiplicity and cleverness of those who assemble objections and magnify difficulties about believing in God. It requires no great depth of intellect to pick flaws, ask questions, or raise objections. But it does require brilliance of mind to answer these questions and solve these difficulties; faith certainty is the greatest technique for dealing with all such superficial contentions.
.
If science, philosophy, or sociology dares to become dogmatic in contending with the prophets of true religion, then should God-knowing men reply to such unwarranted dogmatism with that more farseeing dogmatism of the certainty of personal spiritual experience, " I know what I have experienced because I am a son of I AM. " If the personal experience of a faither is to be challenged by dogma, then this faith-born son of the experiencible Father may reply with that unchallengeable dogma, the statement of his actual sonship with
 the Universal Father.
.
 Only an unqualified reality, an absolute, could dare consistently to be dogmatic. Those who assume to be dogmatic must, if consistent, sooner or later be driven into the arms of the Absolute of energy, the Universal of truth,
 and the Infinite of love.
.
.
 If the nonreligious approaches to cosmic reality presume to challenge the certainty of faith on the grounds of its unproved status, then the spirit experiencer can likewise resort to the dogmatic challenge of the facts of science and the beliefs of philosophy on the grounds that they are likewise unproved; they are likewise experiences in the consciousness of the scientist or the philosopher.
.
.
Of God, the most inescapable of all presences, the most real of all facts, the most living of all truths, the most loving of all friends, and the most divine of all values, we have the right to be the most certain of all universe experiences.
.
.
.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

MYTH AND MEN IN INDONESIA

.



.
Although Western visitors now travel
there by the millions, the East still offers
rewards of mystery to the adventuresome.
In 1972 Lawrence Blair and his brother Lorne
left England to film the greater bird of paradise,
long an Asian symbol of transformation and
immortality. They found an elusive specimen,
like the one above, high in a Javanese forest.
But it was certainly not their most
exotic discovery.
.
In their Indonesian travels they came upon
a world of myths, rites, and beliefs that had
existed unchanged since before recorded
time. In Bali, a newborn is thought to remain
close to the heavenly Upper World for its
first 105 days and thus is not allowed to
touch the earth; after this period the baby's
foot is ritually placed on the ground.
.



.
The ancient belief of the Toraja people
is almost futuristic; that their ancestors
arrived in starships from the star cluster
Pleiades. The swamp-dwelling Asmat have
a pre-Stone Age culture. They believe their
creator carved their bodies from trees and
drummed them into life. Cannibals as well
as headhunters, the Asmat drum the spirits
of their slain kinfolk into wooden totems;
there the spirits await the release that
comes when someone from the enemy tribe
is killed, beheaded, and eaten.
.




.
The Blairs claimed they encountered
phenomena not easily explainable in
Western terms. On an island in the
Banda Sea, they saw a man in a trance
they described as an "example of pure
animist possession." A boulder was
slammed into his back but left neither
blemish nor injury.
*
From Eastern Mysteries
A volume from the Time-Life Series
Mysteries of the Unknown
.





.
From THE URANTIA BOOK, Part III, 101, 9
.
When you presume to sit in
critical judgement on the primitive religion
of man (or on the religion of primitive man),
you should remember to judge such savages
and to evaluate their religious experience
in accordance with their enlightenment
and status of conscience. Do not make the
mistake of judging another's religion by
your own standards of knowledge
and truth. .

.

Monday, January 31, 2011

RELIGION IN TIBET

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
From THE URANTIA BOOK
Part III, 94, 10
.
In Tibet may be found the strangest association
of the Melchizedek teachings combined with Buddhism,
Hinduism, Taoism, and Christianity.
When the Buddhist missionaries entered Tibet, they
encountered a state of primitive savagery very similar
to that which the early Christian missionaries
found among the northern tribes of Europe.
These simple-minded Tibetans would not
wholly give up their ancient magic and charms.
.
Examination of the religious ceremonials of
present-day Tibetan rituals reveals an
overgrown brotherhood of priests with shaven
heads who practice an elaborate ritual embracing
bells, chants, incense, processionals, rosaries,
images, charms, pictures, holy water, gorgeous
vestments, and elaborate choirs.
They have rigid dogmas and crystallized creeds,
mystic rites and special fasts.
.
.

Their hierarchy embraces monks, nuns,
abbots, and the Grand Lama. They pray to angels,
saints, a Holy Mother, and the gods. They practice
confessions and believe in purgatory.
Their monasteries are extensive and their
cathedrals magnificent. They keep up an
endless repetition of sacred rituals and believe
that such ceremonials bestow salvation.
Prayers are fastened to a wheel, and with
its turning they believe the petitions
become efficacious.
.
 Among no other people of
modern times can be found the observance of
so much from so many religions;
and it is inevitable that such a cumulative liturgy
would become inordinately cumbersome
and intolerably burdensome.
.


.

.

.
.
The Tibetans have something of all the
leading world religions except the simple teachings
of the Jesusonian gospel: sonship with God,
brotherhood with man, and ever-ascending citizenship
in the eternal universe.
.
 .

.
(It should be noted that THE URANTIA BOOK passage
came out in the first half of the 20th century, and
cannot account for the current state of
religious evolution in Tibet.)
.
.